Hello friends today we will discuss about the concept termed as frustration of contract. It is originated from the Roman laws. In India, it is defined under Sec 56 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, which says that an agreement to do an impossible act is itself void. Further, in case a contract was possible at the time of agreement but becomes impossible afterwards, it also comes under this purview. Moreover, it also contain provisions for compensation in case the other party having knowledge about the impossibility of a particular act, still enters into a contract for the performance of the same. Sometimes, people get confused between Sec 32 and Sec 56 of the Contract Act, however, there is a thin line between the two. Sec 32 of the Act deals with the contingent contract whereby happening or non-happening of an event governs the contract thereby making it as a void contract in case of such violation, in contrast under Sec 56 of the Act, as already discussed, the performance becom...