Skip to main content

INTERIM COMPENSATION IN A CHEQUE BOUNCE CASE

                                     
As already discussed in our earlier blogs, that in case a cheque is dishonored, then the same attracts a criminal complaint which is governed by Sec 138 NI Act. Now, today in this blog we will discuss as to how during the pendency of a cheque bounce case, the complainant may get certain compensation pending its trial. This is made possible by the insertion of Sec 143A which has come into effect w.e.f July 2018. As per this amendment, the court may upon an application grant compensation to be given to the complainant which is equivalent to 20% of the amount as mentioned in the cheque. For application of this section, it has be seen that the accused has not pleaded guilty, which means that in cases where the accused wants to defend the matter and claims trial, in such cases, the court may grant the 20 % of the amount as mentioned in cheque in question to be paid to the complainant by the accused pending trial. Moreover, in case after directed by the court, the accused fails to comply with it, the complainant may enforce its efficacy by use of Sec 421 CrPC.
Further in case after the commencement of the trial of the case, if the court comes to the conclusion that the accuse id innocent and aquits him/her. in such a situation the complainant will be directed to withdraw the amount enjoyed by him along with rate of interest to the complainant. However, the provisions of this section would be applicable prospectively i.e. apply to cases filed after the said section has become applicable as mentioned above.

CONCLUSION 
By insertion of this very provision, it has given some relief at the inception to the persons who has been deprived of their hard earned money and was forced to file a case in order to recover their money, giving them some sort of support to at least bear their litigation costs.

Comments

  1. Love this article! Useful and informative. looking forward to see more like this. Also check this out workers compensation services Greene County. Thank you.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

MARRIAGE REGISTRATION PROCESS IN DELHI

 Hello friends today we shall talk about the procedure for registration of marriage in Delhi.   ELIGIBILITY The marriage must have been solemnized either under the Hindu Marriage Act or under the Special Marriage Act, The Groom must have attained the minimum age of 21 years. The bride must be of the age of 18 years at least.   DOCUMENTS REQUIRED Photo ID proofs of both the parties like Aadhar card / PAN card / Voter card Date of birth proofs of both parties like 10 th certificate, etc. Permanent address proof must be there . Marriage photographs and Invitation Card. Passport Size Photographs of both parties. 2 witness in case marriage registered under Hindu Marriage Act or 3 witnesses in case it is registered under the Special Marriage Act along with their respective proofs like PAN CARD/ AADHAR CARD etc. An affidavit from both parties certifying the date of their marriage and more specifically stating that the marriage has not been performed between pers...

BENGALURU CONSUMER COURT IMPOSES PENALTY ON FLIPKART

RECENTLY BENGALURU DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM DIRECTED ONLINE MERCHANT FLIPKART TO REFUND AN ANOUNT OF RS. 13,999/- ALONGWITH COMPENSATION OF RS. 10,000/- TO A 80-YEAR OLD FOR CAUSING MENTAL AGONY. BRIEF FACTS An 80 -Year Old Consumer ordered a treadmill on the online site of Opposite Party Flipkart. In compliance the treadmill was delivered to the consumer. At the time of installation of the product, it was revealed by the technician that the treadmill is faulty. On coming to know that the consumer returned the product to Flipkart and sought replacement. Initially Flipkart failed to replace the product but in some time, the replaced product was delivered to consumer, however, despite requests they failed to send the technician. When consumer tried to fix the same on its own, it was found that the product was of some other company. In other words, it was not the same product which has been initially ordered by the consumer. With no resolution, the consumer was left with no other option bu...

KERALA HIGH COURT BARS ENTRY OF 10 YEAR GIRL FROM ENTERING SABARIMALA TEMPLE

RECENTLY KERALA HIGH COURT DISMISSED WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLE  226 OF CONSTITUTION FILED BY FATHER ON BEHALF OF HIS 10- YEAR OLD GIRL FOR SEEKING AN ORDER TO ENTER SABARIMALA TEMPLE. THE SAME IS DISMISSED IN LIGHT OF REVIEW PENDING ON THE SAID ISSUE BEFORE THE LARGER BENCH OF THE APEX COURT. BRIEF FACTS 10 year old girl filed a writ petition before the Kerala HIgh Court seeking relief of mandamus seeking directions to Travancore Devaswom Board to allow her to offer pilgrimage to Sabarimala Temple without taking into account the restrictions of age since she has not attained puberty or in the alternative to allow the request of the minor on sympathetic grounds. It is contended by the Petitioner that they are planning to visit the temple since long and it has been delayed due to onset of Covid earlier. Now, the family is under distress and also the father of Petitioner is not in good health. Hence, they have applied the same online but since in the meanwhile the age of Petit...