Skip to main content

DEFAMATION

Hello friends today we will discuss the cases of defamation, where harm is caused to a person’s reputation by another and the steps which that person might resort to. Person here may be a company or an association of persons, etc. A Defamation must fulfill 3 primary conditions:

  1. The statement made should be untrue and malicious. 
  2. It should be presented as a fact
  3. It should be made or published to harm the reputation of other.

There are two forms of defamation in general, which can be termed as:

  • Slander It means defamation by certain    oral mode.
  • Libel on the other hand comprise of situations where some words, representations, diagrams or pictures are being used to hurt the reputation of a person. Eg. 2012:Chris Cairns vs Lalit Modi


GENERAL EXAMPLES OF DEFAMATION 

a.  In case a person is dead, in such an event mere imputation causing harm to the reputation of that person if he was alive or even harm being caused to his family or relatives, amounts to defamation.

b.  Defamation may be an offence even in case of company or a group of persons.

c.  Anything which lowers the moral or intellectual character of a person, or lowers the character of a person or lowers his credit or might bring disgrace to him amounts to defamation.

These are only few of the general instances which are termed as  defamation. However, this is not an exhaustive list.


EXCEPTIONS

Now, in contrast to the above, there can be many exceptions where the particular instance may seem to be an offence but it is not punishable under defamation :

a. If anything true is said/written against a person, and it is important in terms of public good.

b.  Fair criticism of public servant.

c.  Publication of the reports of courts and the merits of case.

d. Fair comment on conduct of any public person other than public servants.

e.  Literary criticism. 

f.  Complaint to the lawful authorities in good faith. 

    These are only a few of the many exceptions to the offence of defamation.

 

DEFAMATION: CIVIL VS CRIMINAL

In India, defamation can be both civil as well as a criminal offence. It means that a person who has been subjected to the offence of defamation can take criminal as well as civil action.

 

CRIMINAL DEFAMATION

It is defined under Sec 499 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. It states that any person by words either spoken or written, representations, signs, etc. makes or publishes any imputation concerning any person intending to harm, or believing it to be harmful, commits the offence of defamation.  Such an offence is a bailable offence for which the person aggrieved might move to the court by registering complaint under this section. Police authorities cannot file the case directly without the order of the Magistrate.

 

CIVIL DEFAMATION

There is no codified law as far as civil defamation is concerned, it is based on previous case laws. Under the civil law prevailing in India, person aggrieved might approach the court for seeking reliefs such as compensation, damages, injunction order, etc. Injunction order means that the person aggrieved might approach the court and ask that the person who has defamed him by some act might be ordered to stop the same immediately. Such an order might be given even without the presence of the defendant in cases where there is a substantial evidence of defamation. Such type of orders are known as ex parte orders. These type of orders of restrain is generally passed in an application filed along with the civil suit under the provision of ORDER XXXIX RULE 1 & 2 CPC ( Civil Procedure Code., 1908).

 

CONCLUSION

Therefore in India, every person has a right to live with respect and utmost dignity, and any such person who harms or even intends to harm such right can be taken to the court for the offence of defamation both for civil as well as criminal consequences. I hope you have understood the basics of defamation. For any further queries, feel free to write in our comment section.

 

 

Comments

  1. Wakeelsaab , Thanks for providing an overview on Defamation and enlightening on one's rights. Kailash Madan, M.com, LL.B., CAIIB, ACS

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

MARRIAGE REGISTRATION PROCESS IN DELHI

 Hello friends today we shall talk about the procedure for registration of marriage in Delhi.   ELIGIBILITY The marriage must have been solemnized either under the Hindu Marriage Act or under the Special Marriage Act, The Groom must have attained the minimum age of 21 years. The bride must be of the age of 18 years at least.   DOCUMENTS REQUIRED Photo ID proofs of both the parties like Aadhar card / PAN card / Voter card Date of birth proofs of both parties like 10 th certificate, etc. Permanent address proof must be there . Marriage photographs and Invitation Card. Passport Size Photographs of both parties. 2 witness in case marriage registered under Hindu Marriage Act or 3 witnesses in case it is registered under the Special Marriage Act along with their respective proofs like PAN CARD/ AADHAR CARD etc. An affidavit from both parties certifying the date of their marriage and more specifically stating that the marriage has not been performed between pers...

BENGALURU CONSUMER COURT IMPOSES PENALTY ON FLIPKART

RECENTLY BENGALURU DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM DIRECTED ONLINE MERCHANT FLIPKART TO REFUND AN ANOUNT OF RS. 13,999/- ALONGWITH COMPENSATION OF RS. 10,000/- TO A 80-YEAR OLD FOR CAUSING MENTAL AGONY. BRIEF FACTS An 80 -Year Old Consumer ordered a treadmill on the online site of Opposite Party Flipkart. In compliance the treadmill was delivered to the consumer. At the time of installation of the product, it was revealed by the technician that the treadmill is faulty. On coming to know that the consumer returned the product to Flipkart and sought replacement. Initially Flipkart failed to replace the product but in some time, the replaced product was delivered to consumer, however, despite requests they failed to send the technician. When consumer tried to fix the same on its own, it was found that the product was of some other company. In other words, it was not the same product which has been initially ordered by the consumer. With no resolution, the consumer was left with no other option bu...

KERALA HIGH COURT BARS ENTRY OF 10 YEAR GIRL FROM ENTERING SABARIMALA TEMPLE

RECENTLY KERALA HIGH COURT DISMISSED WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLE  226 OF CONSTITUTION FILED BY FATHER ON BEHALF OF HIS 10- YEAR OLD GIRL FOR SEEKING AN ORDER TO ENTER SABARIMALA TEMPLE. THE SAME IS DISMISSED IN LIGHT OF REVIEW PENDING ON THE SAID ISSUE BEFORE THE LARGER BENCH OF THE APEX COURT. BRIEF FACTS 10 year old girl filed a writ petition before the Kerala HIgh Court seeking relief of mandamus seeking directions to Travancore Devaswom Board to allow her to offer pilgrimage to Sabarimala Temple without taking into account the restrictions of age since she has not attained puberty or in the alternative to allow the request of the minor on sympathetic grounds. It is contended by the Petitioner that they are planning to visit the temple since long and it has been delayed due to onset of Covid earlier. Now, the family is under distress and also the father of Petitioner is not in good health. Hence, they have applied the same online but since in the meanwhile the age of Petit...