Skip to main content

BRIEF NOTE ON CONTINGENT CONTRACTS

 

Hello friends today we will discuss the term Contingent Contracts defined in Chapter III of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. In common words, it is a contract which is dependent upon happening or not happening of a particular event.

Some important provisions governing the same are explained below as under :-

Sec 31 of the Act defines a contingent contract as a contract to do or not to do something, if some event, collateral to such contract, does or does not happen.

Eg A contracts with B to pay Rs. 10,000 if B’s house is burnt. It is a contingent contract.

Sec 32 talks about the enforcement of such contracts, which depends upon happening or not happening of the uncertain future event. In case, such an event do not happen, it becomes a contingent contract.

Eg A makes a contract with B to buy B’s house if A survives C. Now this contract can only be enforced if C dies during A’s lifetime.

A contracts with B to pay a certain sum if he marries C. Now if C dies before marriage, contract becomes void.

Sec 33 talks of the contingent contract in case certain event does not happen.

Eg A agrees to pay B if a certain ship does not return. Now if the ship is sunk, contract becomes enforceable.

Sec 34 talks of a contract where an uncertain future event is deemed to be impossible.

Eg A agrees to pay B a sum of money if he marries C. C marries D, thus, marriage of B with C is deemed to be impossible.

Sec 35 talks about happening or non–happening of a particular event within a fixed time limit.

Eg A agrees to pay B if a particular ship is returned within a year. Here if the ship is returned after expiry of one year it cannot be enforced.

Sec 36 talks of contingent contracts based on impossible events (whether known or not known to parties at the time of contracting) to be considered as void.

Eg A agrees to pay B if he marries C. C was dead at the time the agreement was made, hence contract is void.

 

For any query please feel free to write in our comment section.

 

   

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

MARRIAGE REGISTRATION PROCESS IN DELHI

 Hello friends today we shall talk about the procedure for registration of marriage in Delhi.   ELIGIBILITY The marriage must have been solemnized either under the Hindu Marriage Act or under the Special Marriage Act, The Groom must have attained the minimum age of 21 years. The bride must be of the age of 18 years at least.   DOCUMENTS REQUIRED Photo ID proofs of both the parties like Aadhar card / PAN card / Voter card Date of birth proofs of both parties like 10 th certificate, etc. Permanent address proof must be there . Marriage photographs and Invitation Card. Passport Size Photographs of both parties. 2 witness in case marriage registered under Hindu Marriage Act or 3 witnesses in case it is registered under the Special Marriage Act along with their respective proofs like PAN CARD/ AADHAR CARD etc. An affidavit from both parties certifying the date of their marriage and more specifically stating that the marriage has not been performed between pers...

BENGALURU CONSUMER COURT IMPOSES PENALTY ON FLIPKART

RECENTLY BENGALURU DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM DIRECTED ONLINE MERCHANT FLIPKART TO REFUND AN ANOUNT OF RS. 13,999/- ALONGWITH COMPENSATION OF RS. 10,000/- TO A 80-YEAR OLD FOR CAUSING MENTAL AGONY. BRIEF FACTS An 80 -Year Old Consumer ordered a treadmill on the online site of Opposite Party Flipkart. In compliance the treadmill was delivered to the consumer. At the time of installation of the product, it was revealed by the technician that the treadmill is faulty. On coming to know that the consumer returned the product to Flipkart and sought replacement. Initially Flipkart failed to replace the product but in some time, the replaced product was delivered to consumer, however, despite requests they failed to send the technician. When consumer tried to fix the same on its own, it was found that the product was of some other company. In other words, it was not the same product which has been initially ordered by the consumer. With no resolution, the consumer was left with no other option bu...

KERALA HIGH COURT BARS ENTRY OF 10 YEAR GIRL FROM ENTERING SABARIMALA TEMPLE

RECENTLY KERALA HIGH COURT DISMISSED WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLE  226 OF CONSTITUTION FILED BY FATHER ON BEHALF OF HIS 10- YEAR OLD GIRL FOR SEEKING AN ORDER TO ENTER SABARIMALA TEMPLE. THE SAME IS DISMISSED IN LIGHT OF REVIEW PENDING ON THE SAID ISSUE BEFORE THE LARGER BENCH OF THE APEX COURT. BRIEF FACTS 10 year old girl filed a writ petition before the Kerala HIgh Court seeking relief of mandamus seeking directions to Travancore Devaswom Board to allow her to offer pilgrimage to Sabarimala Temple without taking into account the restrictions of age since she has not attained puberty or in the alternative to allow the request of the minor on sympathetic grounds. It is contended by the Petitioner that they are planning to visit the temple since long and it has been delayed due to onset of Covid earlier. Now, the family is under distress and also the father of Petitioner is not in good health. Hence, they have applied the same online but since in the meanwhile the age of Petit...