Skip to main content

EXAMINERS REPORT IN TRADEMARK

INTRODUCTION 

Hello Friends, today we will discuss on the kind of objections one might encounter while registering a trademark in India. The objections are usually communicated to the applicant through an examiners report. As very clear from the name itself, examiners report simply means the report which is prepared by the examiner once an application for registering a trademark is being filed. The said report contains different objections with regard to the registration of the said mark. The detailed analysis of objections that might be put forth by way of the examiners report is discussed below:


TYPES OF OBJECTIONS

1. ABSOLUTE  

2. RELATIVE 


Absolute Grounds of Refusal

Such type of objection is taken when the applied trademark is incapable of distinguishing the goods or services of one person with those of another. In other words, such objection is taken when such mark does not contain any type of inherent distinctiveness of its own. This type of objection is usually covered under Section 9(1)(a) of the Trademark Act, 1999.

Other objection which is also covered under one of grounds of absolute refusal is covered under Section 9 (1) (b) of the Trademark Act, 1999. In such a case, the said mark is liable to be refused on account of being illustrative of any geographical region, any common name, place, description of services or goods for which the same is used for, etc.


Relative Grounds of Refusal

Such type of objections is generally raised under Sec 11 (1) of the Trademark Act, 1999. As the word relative suggests it means that the mark applied for is similar to the other marks already present on the registry of Trademark and on that account the mark of the applicant is liable to be refused.


After receipt of the examination report, the applicant in person or through his agent is asked to file a reply within a period of 30 days from receipt, failing which the applicant's mark is laible to be abandoned.

I hope you have understood different grounds upon which your trademark application may be refused.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

MARRIAGE REGISTRATION PROCESS IN DELHI

 Hello friends today we shall talk about the procedure for registration of marriage in Delhi.   ELIGIBILITY The marriage must have been solemnized either under the Hindu Marriage Act or under the Special Marriage Act, The Groom must have attained the minimum age of 21 years. The bride must be of the age of 18 years at least.   DOCUMENTS REQUIRED Photo ID proofs of both the parties like Aadhar card / PAN card / Voter card Date of birth proofs of both parties like 10 th certificate, etc. Permanent address proof must be there . Marriage photographs and Invitation Card. Passport Size Photographs of both parties. 2 witness in case marriage registered under Hindu Marriage Act or 3 witnesses in case it is registered under the Special Marriage Act along with their respective proofs like PAN CARD/ AADHAR CARD etc. An affidavit from both parties certifying the date of their marriage and more specifically stating that the marriage has not been performed between pers...

BENGALURU CONSUMER COURT IMPOSES PENALTY ON FLIPKART

RECENTLY BENGALURU DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM DIRECTED ONLINE MERCHANT FLIPKART TO REFUND AN ANOUNT OF RS. 13,999/- ALONGWITH COMPENSATION OF RS. 10,000/- TO A 80-YEAR OLD FOR CAUSING MENTAL AGONY. BRIEF FACTS An 80 -Year Old Consumer ordered a treadmill on the online site of Opposite Party Flipkart. In compliance the treadmill was delivered to the consumer. At the time of installation of the product, it was revealed by the technician that the treadmill is faulty. On coming to know that the consumer returned the product to Flipkart and sought replacement. Initially Flipkart failed to replace the product but in some time, the replaced product was delivered to consumer, however, despite requests they failed to send the technician. When consumer tried to fix the same on its own, it was found that the product was of some other company. In other words, it was not the same product which has been initially ordered by the consumer. With no resolution, the consumer was left with no other option bu...

KERALA HIGH COURT BARS ENTRY OF 10 YEAR GIRL FROM ENTERING SABARIMALA TEMPLE

RECENTLY KERALA HIGH COURT DISMISSED WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLE  226 OF CONSTITUTION FILED BY FATHER ON BEHALF OF HIS 10- YEAR OLD GIRL FOR SEEKING AN ORDER TO ENTER SABARIMALA TEMPLE. THE SAME IS DISMISSED IN LIGHT OF REVIEW PENDING ON THE SAID ISSUE BEFORE THE LARGER BENCH OF THE APEX COURT. BRIEF FACTS 10 year old girl filed a writ petition before the Kerala HIgh Court seeking relief of mandamus seeking directions to Travancore Devaswom Board to allow her to offer pilgrimage to Sabarimala Temple without taking into account the restrictions of age since she has not attained puberty or in the alternative to allow the request of the minor on sympathetic grounds. It is contended by the Petitioner that they are planning to visit the temple since long and it has been delayed due to onset of Covid earlier. Now, the family is under distress and also the father of Petitioner is not in good health. Hence, they have applied the same online but since in the meanwhile the age of Petit...