Skip to main content

BASIC PRE-REQUISITES FOR FILING A SUIT FOR CANCELLATION OF AN INSTRUMENT


INTRODUCTION

Very often parties enter into some arrangement by signing some documents or the other. However, there are instances where the said document may sometimes be procured by placing a party to it into some sort of deceit, so that the very intention of the document for which it has been entered become frustrated. Also, there is a situation where a person being the rightful owner of a piece of land comes to know that some other person is trying to interfere in its peaceful possession by portraying some other documents which might have been created through exercise of fraud. In such cases, the rightful owner can go to the court of law seeking the declaration that the documents in possession of the party in fraud may be declared as null and void.

Now in order to seek the relief of such a sort as discussed above, two type of situations might commonly arise:-

A. WHERE THE PARTY SEEKING CANCELLATION IS A PARTY TO THE SAID INSTRUMENT

B. WHERE THE PARTY SEEKING CANCELLATION IS NOT A PARTY TO THE SAID INSTRUMENT 

In first scenario, since the party seeking the relief for declaration/cancellation is a party to the contract/agreement, in such a case, the party coming to the court might seek the relief of cancellation of the said instrument by paying the court fee in proportion to the valuation of the said instrument which is sought to be cancelled.

in second scenario, since the party seeking relief is a third party to the contract/agreement, in such cases mere seeking of the relief of declaration is sufficient without paying the court on the value of the instrument which is sought to be declared as null and void.

CONCLUSION 

Such type of cases are generally coupled with the relief of injunction which is sought by paying the fixed court fee as per rules.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Parental disputes or pending matrimonial and criminal matters between the natural guardians cannot constitute a valid statutory reason for refusal to issue passport says Allahabad High Court

Facts and Background The case involved a minor child aged about 2 years at the time of application whose mother applied for her passport on January 17, 2025. Despite completing all required formalities, the passport authorities kept the application pending indefinitely. The reason cited was the ongoing matrimonial dispute and criminal cases between the child's parents (the natural guardians). The authorities essentially treated these parental conflicts as a ground to withhold progress on the minor's passport application. The mother approached the Allahabad High Court via a writ petition, seeking directions for expeditious processing and issuance. Observations of the Court   Section 6 is Exhaustive and Mandatory   Section 6 of the Passports Act, 1967, provides the complete and exclusive list of grounds on which a passport authority may refuse to issue a passport or travel document.      - These grounds include matters like:       ...

MARRIAGE REGISTRATION PROCESS IN DELHI

 Hello friends today we shall talk about the procedure for registration of marriage in Delhi.   ELIGIBILITY The marriage must have been solemnized either under the Hindu Marriage Act or under the Special Marriage Act, The Groom must have attained the minimum age of 21 years. The bride must be of the age of 18 years at least.   DOCUMENTS REQUIRED Photo ID proofs of both the parties like Aadhar card / PAN card / Voter card Date of birth proofs of both parties like 10 th certificate, etc. Permanent address proof must be there . Marriage photographs and Invitation Card. Passport Size Photographs of both parties. 2 witness in case marriage registered under Hindu Marriage Act or 3 witnesses in case it is registered under the Special Marriage Act along with their respective proofs like PAN CARD/ AADHAR CARD etc. An affidavit from both parties certifying the date of their marriage and more specifically stating that the marriage has not been performed between pers...

DISTRICT COURT THRISSUR, KERALA HELD AIR ASIA LIABLE FOR DEFICIENCY IN SERVICE AND UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES

Introduction    District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission in Thrissur, Kerala (India), held AirAsia India Limited liable for deficiency in service and unfair trade practices. Facts and Background In this matter, a passenger's flight was cancelled by the airline for operational reasons. Under applicable rules (including those from India's Directorate General of Civil Aviation or DGCA, and the Consumer Protection Act), passengers are typically entitled to a full refund in such cases, and many airlines (including low-cost carriers like AirAsia) are expected to process automatic refunds promptly without requiring manual claims in straightforward cancellations. However, AirAsia failed to issue an automatic refund for the ticket amount (which was ₹2,983). The passenger made repeated attempts to obtain the refund but faced ongoing issues and harassment, ultimately having to approach the consumer forum to recover even this small sum. This caused financial loss, inconvenience, a...