Skip to main content

LAW OF WRITS

It is given as a constitutional status in India. These laws are being used as a check system to the proper implementation of the law prevalent in our country.

Different types of writs are as under:-

1. WRIT OF MANDAMUS

Such type of writs are being used in a situation where any direction/order is issued to any person or authority in case such person or authority fails to act as per the functions entrusted to it. Eg where a person has been deprived of a license even after complying with the requistes, in such a situation he may approach the High Court within whose jurisdiction such office is situated to get a direction regarding the issuance of the license as per law.

2. WRIT OF CERTIORARI 

Such writs are in nature of an order whereby the High Court may call for the records of the lower courts when it has acted illegally or beyond its jurisdiction.

3.    WRIT OF PROHIBITION

Such writs can be used whereby an authority /person may be restrained from acting in a manner which is beyond its jurisdiction.

4. WRIT OF HABEUS CORPUS

It literally means bring/produce the body. In common parlance, such writs can be used to mainly protect ones personal liberty. Such rights gets suspended during the situation of an emergency.

5. WRIT OF QUO WARRANTO

Such writs are being used where a certain post is being challenged in contravention to the eligibility for the same.

These are some common types of writs being exercised in our country for implementation of our rights.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Parental disputes or pending matrimonial and criminal matters between the natural guardians cannot constitute a valid statutory reason for refusal to issue passport says Allahabad High Court

Facts and Background The case involved a minor child aged about 2 years at the time of application whose mother applied for her passport on January 17, 2025. Despite completing all required formalities, the passport authorities kept the application pending indefinitely. The reason cited was the ongoing matrimonial dispute and criminal cases between the child's parents (the natural guardians). The authorities essentially treated these parental conflicts as a ground to withhold progress on the minor's passport application. The mother approached the Allahabad High Court via a writ petition, seeking directions for expeditious processing and issuance. Observations of the Court   Section 6 is Exhaustive and Mandatory   Section 6 of the Passports Act, 1967, provides the complete and exclusive list of grounds on which a passport authority may refuse to issue a passport or travel document.      - These grounds include matters like:       ...

MARRIAGE REGISTRATION PROCESS IN DELHI

 Hello friends today we shall talk about the procedure for registration of marriage in Delhi.   ELIGIBILITY The marriage must have been solemnized either under the Hindu Marriage Act or under the Special Marriage Act, The Groom must have attained the minimum age of 21 years. The bride must be of the age of 18 years at least.   DOCUMENTS REQUIRED Photo ID proofs of both the parties like Aadhar card / PAN card / Voter card Date of birth proofs of both parties like 10 th certificate, etc. Permanent address proof must be there . Marriage photographs and Invitation Card. Passport Size Photographs of both parties. 2 witness in case marriage registered under Hindu Marriage Act or 3 witnesses in case it is registered under the Special Marriage Act along with their respective proofs like PAN CARD/ AADHAR CARD etc. An affidavit from both parties certifying the date of their marriage and more specifically stating that the marriage has not been performed between pers...

DISTRICT COURT THRISSUR, KERALA HELD AIR ASIA LIABLE FOR DEFICIENCY IN SERVICE AND UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES

Introduction    District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission in Thrissur, Kerala (India), held AirAsia India Limited liable for deficiency in service and unfair trade practices. Facts and Background In this matter, a passenger's flight was cancelled by the airline for operational reasons. Under applicable rules (including those from India's Directorate General of Civil Aviation or DGCA, and the Consumer Protection Act), passengers are typically entitled to a full refund in such cases, and many airlines (including low-cost carriers like AirAsia) are expected to process automatic refunds promptly without requiring manual claims in straightforward cancellations. However, AirAsia failed to issue an automatic refund for the ticket amount (which was ₹2,983). The passenger made repeated attempts to obtain the refund but faced ongoing issues and harassment, ultimately having to approach the consumer forum to recover even this small sum. This caused financial loss, inconvenience, a...