Skip to main content

REJECTION OF PLAINT

                                                     
INTRODUCTION

This principle is enshrined under the provisions of Order 7 Rule 11 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908. As per this provision, in case a particular case comes under any of the pre-requisites as defined under its sub-clause, in such an event the person agaisnt whom the case is filed can file an application under this provison pratying for the reection of the plaint. This is because it is well settled that in case a particular case is not maintaianble in lieu of the principles enshrined by this very provison, then it shall be proper to reject the same in its very inception.
RELEVANT CONDITIONS WHEN THIS PROVISION MAY BE APPLIED:-

1.WHEN THE PLAINT DISCLOSES NO CAUSE OF ACTION { Order 7 Rule 11(a)}
In case where upon bare reading of the plaint it is seen that the plaint is devoid of having a cause of action, in such cases the defendant as soon as possible might move an appkication for rejection of the plaint under the provision as discussed above.

2. UNDER VALUATION OF THE SUIT { Order 7 Rule 11(b)}
In cases, where the cases filed is being under valued, in such circumstances this provision may be applied for rejection of the plaint.

3. DEFICIENT COURT FEE{ Order 7 Rule 11(c)}
Under this sub clause,  where inspite of the time being given by the court, the plaintiff fails to deposit the deficit court, in such a case, the court has power to reject the plaint as per law.

4.  BARRED BY ANY LAW{ Order 7 Rule 11(d)}
Under this provision, in case the suit filed is barred by any law for the time being in force, in such an event the court can reject the plaint as per law.

CONCLUSION 

The whole idea behind invocation of this provision is to prevent unnecessary litigations by detecting it in the very beginning so that it might not add to the already pendency of the cases in the court of law waiting for disposal. Further, it saves the honest litigants from defending the cases and paying expenses endlessly, adding to their misery. It also acts as a check towards unnecessary litigation.

Labels:

Comments

  1. Anonymous4 December 2022 at 12:47

    The Fu Babies™ are back and bringing luck to gamers in Dancing Drums® Slot Machine. This five-reel, three-row sport brings the luck with thrilling Wild, Jackpot and Free Spins options. Enjoy over 185 state-of-the-art desk games all with superior service. We also offer non-public and high-limit gaming areas for the last word|the last word} experience. From the classics to the most well liked|the most popular} new games, Palms Casino Resort in Paradise Las Vegas has 1xbet your favorite method to play on our expansive on line casino flooring.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

MARRIAGE REGISTRATION PROCESS IN DELHI

 Hello friends today we shall talk about the procedure for registration of marriage in Delhi.   ELIGIBILITY The marriage must have been solemnized either under the Hindu Marriage Act or under the Special Marriage Act, The Groom must have attained the minimum age of 21 years. The bride must be of the age of 18 years at least.   DOCUMENTS REQUIRED Photo ID proofs of both the parties like Aadhar card / PAN card / Voter card Date of birth proofs of both parties like 10 th certificate, etc. Permanent address proof must be there . Marriage photographs and Invitation Card. Passport Size Photographs of both parties. 2 witness in case marriage registered under Hindu Marriage Act or 3 witnesses in case it is registered under the Special Marriage Act along with their respective proofs like PAN CARD/ AADHAR CARD etc. An affidavit from both parties certifying the date of their marriage and more specifically stating that the marriage has not been performed between pers...
1 comment
Read more

BENGALURU CONSUMER COURT IMPOSES PENALTY ON FLIPKART

RECENTLY BENGALURU DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM DIRECTED ONLINE MERCHANT FLIPKART TO REFUND AN ANOUNT OF RS. 13,999/- ALONGWITH COMPENSATION OF RS. 10,000/- TO A 80-YEAR OLD FOR CAUSING MENTAL AGONY. BRIEF FACTS An 80 -Year Old Consumer ordered a treadmill on the online site of Opposite Party Flipkart. In compliance the treadmill was delivered to the consumer. At the time of installation of the product, it was revealed by the technician that the treadmill is faulty. On coming to know that the consumer returned the product to Flipkart and sought replacement. Initially Flipkart failed to replace the product but in some time, the replaced product was delivered to consumer, however, despite requests they failed to send the technician. When consumer tried to fix the same on its own, it was found that the product was of some other company. In other words, it was not the same product which has been initially ordered by the consumer. With no resolution, the consumer was left with no other option bu...
Post a Comment
Read more

KERALA HIGH COURT BARS ENTRY OF 10 YEAR GIRL FROM ENTERING SABARIMALA TEMPLE

RECENTLY KERALA HIGH COURT DISMISSED WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLE  226 OF CONSTITUTION FILED BY FATHER ON BEHALF OF HIS 10- YEAR OLD GIRL FOR SEEKING AN ORDER TO ENTER SABARIMALA TEMPLE. THE SAME IS DISMISSED IN LIGHT OF REVIEW PENDING ON THE SAID ISSUE BEFORE THE LARGER BENCH OF THE APEX COURT. BRIEF FACTS 10 year old girl filed a writ petition before the Kerala HIgh Court seeking relief of mandamus seeking directions to Travancore Devaswom Board to allow her to offer pilgrimage to Sabarimala Temple without taking into account the restrictions of age since she has not attained puberty or in the alternative to allow the request of the minor on sympathetic grounds. It is contended by the Petitioner that they are planning to visit the temple since long and it has been delayed due to onset of Covid earlier. Now, the family is under distress and also the father of Petitioner is not in good health. Hence, they have applied the same online but since in the meanwhile the age of Petit...
Post a Comment
Read more