Skip to main content

REPLY TO EXAMINERS REPORT IN TRADEMARK


INTRODUCTION 

Hello friends, as already discussed in our earlier blog that after filing an application for trademark in India, it can be followed by a report of the examiner pertaining to the objections if any regarding acceptance/refusal of the particular mark. Today we shall discuss about the plausible deniability of the objections which might be raised by the examiners by filing detailed reply.

HERE ARE SOME TIPS FOR DRAFTING A REPLY TO THE EXAMINERS REPORT  

Firstly, Peruse the examiners report very carefully and analyze, on what grounds the particular mark has been objected. In other words, check whether the mark is objected on absolute grounds or on relative grounds. 

Secondly, in case the mark is objected only on absolute ground, in such case, kindly check whether your mark is objected for want of distinctiveness or on account of being descriptive in nature. In both cases, you may draft the reply in such a way that the examiner is convinced that your mark is an inventive word and fully capable of distinctiveness. However, in case your mark is objected on relative grounds, i.e., other marks are cited to which your mark is being compared and found similar, in such a case, you may check all those marks individually and find the dissimilarities present in your mark in comparison to the cited marks. The said dissimilarities may then be clearly mentioned in the reply so that the examiner is able to draw a distinction between different marks compared. Also, sometimes, there are certain common similarities in marks of a particular class, which is prevalent in almost all the marks compared and also in your mark. In such a case, you may convince the examiner by adding in your reply that since other marks carrying the same / similar words are also existing on the register of the trademark, then our mark containing the similar words shall also be registered on same grounds.

Thirdly, you may also add relevant judgements pertaining to the kind of objection as raised in your case, so that your case must be supported by law. This is one of the most important step and shall not be skipped in any case.

Fourthly, your reply may also incorporate all the cost and expenses that you have incurred towards the promotion and advertising your mark, and also the goodwill that has been attached to your mark till date.

Fifthly, you may keep in mind that the said reply has to be filed within a period of 30 days from receipt of the examiners report and in case the same is filed within time, no fees is required to be submitted with the same.

I hope I have clearly explained how to file a reply in case of an objection to the trademark. In case of any queries, you may write to us in the comment box.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

MARRIAGE REGISTRATION PROCESS IN DELHI

 Hello friends today we shall talk about the procedure for registration of marriage in Delhi.   ELIGIBILITY The marriage must have been solemnized either under the Hindu Marriage Act or under the Special Marriage Act, The Groom must have attained the minimum age of 21 years. The bride must be of the age of 18 years at least.   DOCUMENTS REQUIRED Photo ID proofs of both the parties like Aadhar card / PAN card / Voter card Date of birth proofs of both parties like 10 th certificate, etc. Permanent address proof must be there . Marriage photographs and Invitation Card. Passport Size Photographs of both parties. 2 witness in case marriage registered under Hindu Marriage Act or 3 witnesses in case it is registered under the Special Marriage Act along with their respective proofs like PAN CARD/ AADHAR CARD etc. An affidavit from both parties certifying the date of their marriage and more specifically stating that the marriage has not been performed between pers...

BENGALURU CONSUMER COURT IMPOSES PENALTY ON FLIPKART

RECENTLY BENGALURU DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM DIRECTED ONLINE MERCHANT FLIPKART TO REFUND AN ANOUNT OF RS. 13,999/- ALONGWITH COMPENSATION OF RS. 10,000/- TO A 80-YEAR OLD FOR CAUSING MENTAL AGONY. BRIEF FACTS An 80 -Year Old Consumer ordered a treadmill on the online site of Opposite Party Flipkart. In compliance the treadmill was delivered to the consumer. At the time of installation of the product, it was revealed by the technician that the treadmill is faulty. On coming to know that the consumer returned the product to Flipkart and sought replacement. Initially Flipkart failed to replace the product but in some time, the replaced product was delivered to consumer, however, despite requests they failed to send the technician. When consumer tried to fix the same on its own, it was found that the product was of some other company. In other words, it was not the same product which has been initially ordered by the consumer. With no resolution, the consumer was left with no other option bu...

KERALA HIGH COURT BARS ENTRY OF 10 YEAR GIRL FROM ENTERING SABARIMALA TEMPLE

RECENTLY KERALA HIGH COURT DISMISSED WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLE  226 OF CONSTITUTION FILED BY FATHER ON BEHALF OF HIS 10- YEAR OLD GIRL FOR SEEKING AN ORDER TO ENTER SABARIMALA TEMPLE. THE SAME IS DISMISSED IN LIGHT OF REVIEW PENDING ON THE SAID ISSUE BEFORE THE LARGER BENCH OF THE APEX COURT. BRIEF FACTS 10 year old girl filed a writ petition before the Kerala HIgh Court seeking relief of mandamus seeking directions to Travancore Devaswom Board to allow her to offer pilgrimage to Sabarimala Temple without taking into account the restrictions of age since she has not attained puberty or in the alternative to allow the request of the minor on sympathetic grounds. It is contended by the Petitioner that they are planning to visit the temple since long and it has been delayed due to onset of Covid earlier. Now, the family is under distress and also the father of Petitioner is not in good health. Hence, they have applied the same online but since in the meanwhile the age of Petit...