Skip to main content

DIVORCE AFTER 22 LONG YEARS

BACKGROUND 

Husband and wife got married in year 2000, at Shillong. Prior to their marriage, both of them were working in same office and known to each other very well. However, despite that just after one year, i.e. in the year 2001, wife left her matrimonial home. Husband tried to bring her back, but the wife refused. Therefore, in 2003, husband was forced to file for divorce.

OBSERVATIONS 

In the year 2010, the District Court decided in favor of husband, and the marriage between the parties stood dissolved. It was observed that that since wife has deserted husband without any cogent reason, therefore the marriage between the parties stood dissolved.  

Aggrieved by the same, wife approached the High Court and filed an appeal. It was contented that wife had no intention to leave the husband permanently. Wife also pleaded that husband was very well aware that she could not leave her job as she is to look after her elderly parents and dependents. Moreover, she said that since husband ill-treated her, therefore she has no other option but to leave the matrimonial home. 



On the other hand, husband stated that when she left the matrimonial home, the husband and other friends/family members made their efforts to bring her back but she remained adamant and told till the time husband keep her mother with him, she will not return.

However, High court observed that conduct of husband in approaching high court even before expiry of 2 years' time of separation seems doubtful and ruled in favor of wife and annulled the decree of divorce. 

The husband then moved to the Supreme Court and finally in the month of Dec 2025, i.e. after almost 22 years, the husband's appeal was allowed and divorce was granted. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

MARRIAGE REGISTRATION PROCESS IN DELHI

 Hello friends today we shall talk about the procedure for registration of marriage in Delhi.   ELIGIBILITY The marriage must have been solemnized either under the Hindu Marriage Act or under the Special Marriage Act, The Groom must have attained the minimum age of 21 years. The bride must be of the age of 18 years at least.   DOCUMENTS REQUIRED Photo ID proofs of both the parties like Aadhar card / PAN card / Voter card Date of birth proofs of both parties like 10 th certificate, etc. Permanent address proof must be there . Marriage photographs and Invitation Card. Passport Size Photographs of both parties. 2 witness in case marriage registered under Hindu Marriage Act or 3 witnesses in case it is registered under the Special Marriage Act along with their respective proofs like PAN CARD/ AADHAR CARD etc. An affidavit from both parties certifying the date of their marriage and more specifically stating that the marriage has not been performed between pers...

BENGALURU CONSUMER COURT IMPOSES PENALTY ON FLIPKART

RECENTLY BENGALURU DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM DIRECTED ONLINE MERCHANT FLIPKART TO REFUND AN ANOUNT OF RS. 13,999/- ALONGWITH COMPENSATION OF RS. 10,000/- TO A 80-YEAR OLD FOR CAUSING MENTAL AGONY. BRIEF FACTS An 80 -Year Old Consumer ordered a treadmill on the online site of Opposite Party Flipkart. In compliance the treadmill was delivered to the consumer. At the time of installation of the product, it was revealed by the technician that the treadmill is faulty. On coming to know that the consumer returned the product to Flipkart and sought replacement. Initially Flipkart failed to replace the product but in some time, the replaced product was delivered to consumer, however, despite requests they failed to send the technician. When consumer tried to fix the same on its own, it was found that the product was of some other company. In other words, it was not the same product which has been initially ordered by the consumer. With no resolution, the consumer was left with no other option bu...

KERALA HIGH COURT BARS ENTRY OF 10 YEAR GIRL FROM ENTERING SABARIMALA TEMPLE

RECENTLY KERALA HIGH COURT DISMISSED WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLE  226 OF CONSTITUTION FILED BY FATHER ON BEHALF OF HIS 10- YEAR OLD GIRL FOR SEEKING AN ORDER TO ENTER SABARIMALA TEMPLE. THE SAME IS DISMISSED IN LIGHT OF REVIEW PENDING ON THE SAID ISSUE BEFORE THE LARGER BENCH OF THE APEX COURT. BRIEF FACTS 10 year old girl filed a writ petition before the Kerala HIgh Court seeking relief of mandamus seeking directions to Travancore Devaswom Board to allow her to offer pilgrimage to Sabarimala Temple without taking into account the restrictions of age since she has not attained puberty or in the alternative to allow the request of the minor on sympathetic grounds. It is contended by the Petitioner that they are planning to visit the temple since long and it has been delayed due to onset of Covid earlier. Now, the family is under distress and also the father of Petitioner is not in good health. Hence, they have applied the same online but since in the meanwhile the age of Petit...