DAUGHTER IN LAW HAS NO LEGAL OBLIGATION TO MAINTAIN HER PARENTS IN LAW SAYS THE ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

INTRODUCTION

The Allahabad High Court recently ruled that a daughter-in-law has no legal obligation to maintain her parents-in-law under maintenance laws.

FACTS AND BACKGROUND

An elderly couple (parents of a deceased son, a policeman who died in 2021) filed a petition seeking maintenance from their widowed daughter-in-law. They emphasized a moral obligation on her part. The family court rejected their claim, and the High Court dismissed their criminal revision petition against that order.

OBSERVATIONS OF THE COURT

The right to claim maintenance under Section 144 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita - BNSS (erstwhile Sec 125 CrPC) is a statutory right limited strictly to the categories of persons explicitly mentioned in the provision. Eligible claimants includes: wife, children, and parents (of the person from whom maintenance is sought). Parents-in-law do not fall within this list.

The legislature did not intend to impose liability for maintenance on a daughter-in-law toward her parents-in-law. Expanding the provision to include such a duty would go against the statutory scheme.

It is further observed that a moral obligation, no matter how compelling, cannot be enforced as a legal obligation without explicit statutory backing.

The court upheld the principle that maintenance claims under this section are summary proceedings meant for immediate relief to specified dependents, not for enforcing broader familial or moral duties.

Conclusion

This ruling aligns with the plain reading of the law: the provision focuses on obligations from a person to their own spouse, children, or parents—not to in-laws. Note that this is specific to proceedings under Section 144 BNSS / 125 CrPC. It does not directly affect other laws, such as the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 (where a widowed daughter-in-law may have rights to claim maintenance from her father-in-law or his estate under certain conditions, like Section 19).

Comments

MARRIAGE REGISTRATION PROCESS IN DELHI

Hello friends today we shall talk about the procedure for registration of marriage in Delhi. ELIGIBILITY The marriage must have been solemnized either under the Hindu Marriage Act or under the Special Marriage Act, The Groom must have attained the minimum age of 21 years. The bride must be of the age of 18 years at least. DOCUMENTS REQUIRED Photo ID proofs of both the parties like Aadhar card / PAN card / Voter card Date of birth proofs of both parties like 10 th certificate, etc. Permanent address proof must be there . Marriage photographs and Invitation Card. Passport Size Photographs of both parties. 2 witness in case marriage registered under Hindu Marriage Act or 3 witnesses in case it is registered under the Special Marriage Act along with their respective proofs like PAN CARD/ AADHAR CARD etc. An affidavit from both parties certifying the date of their marriage and more specifically stating that the marriage has not been performed between pers...

BENGALURU CONSUMER COURT IMPOSES PENALTY ON FLIPKART

RECENTLY BENGALURU DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM DIRECTED ONLINE MERCHANT FLIPKART TO REFUND AN ANOUNT OF RS. 13,999/- ALONGWITH COMPENSATION OF RS. 10,000/- TO A 80-YEAR OLD FOR CAUSING MENTAL AGONY. BRIEF FACTS An 80 -Year Old Consumer ordered a treadmill on the online site of Opposite Party Flipkart. In compliance the treadmill was delivered to the consumer. At the time of installation of the product, it was revealed by the technician that the treadmill is faulty. On coming to know that the consumer returned the product to Flipkart and sought replacement. Initially Flipkart failed to replace the product but in some time, the replaced product was delivered to consumer, however, despite requests they failed to send the technician. When consumer tried to fix the same on its own, it was found that the product was of some other company. In other words, it was not the same product which has been initially ordered by the consumer. With no resolution, the consumer was left with no other option bu...

KERALA HIGH COURT BARS ENTRY OF 10 YEAR GIRL FROM ENTERING SABARIMALA TEMPLE

RECENTLY KERALA HIGH COURT DISMISSED WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION FILED BY FATHER ON BEHALF OF HIS 10- YEAR OLD GIRL FOR SEEKING AN ORDER TO ENTER SABARIMALA TEMPLE. THE SAME IS DISMISSED IN LIGHT OF REVIEW PENDING ON THE SAID ISSUE BEFORE THE LARGER BENCH OF THE APEX COURT. BRIEF FACTS 10 year old girl filed a writ petition before the Kerala HIgh Court seeking relief of mandamus seeking directions to Travancore Devaswom Board to allow her to offer pilgrimage to Sabarimala Temple without taking into account the restrictions of age since she has not attained puberty or in the alternative to allow the request of the minor on sympathetic grounds. It is contended by the Petitioner that they are planning to visit the temple since long and it has been delayed due to onset of Covid earlier. Now, the family is under distress and also the father of Petitioner is not in good health. Hence, they have applied the same online but since in the meanwhile the age of Petit...

WakeelSaab.in

Search This Blog